Anderson v. Commonwealth

134 S.W. 477, 142 Ky. 446, 1911 Ky. LEXIS 210
Court of Appeals of Kentucky·Decided February 23, 1911·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Opinion of The Court by

Judge Nunn

Affirming.

This prosecution was for the violation.of the local option law which was in force in Ashland, Ky. There was no objection before or during the trial to the indictment, by demurrer or otherwise, nor were there any objections made to the testimony, except to the introduction of the United States Government license which were held by [447]*447appellant; nor was there any objection to the instructions given by the court. Under this state of the record, it is unnecessary for the court to consider and discuss the matters raised in appellant’s brief. There was some evidence of guilt and we will not disturb the finding of the jury.

Nor these reasons the judgment of the lower court is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Anderson v. Commonwealth, 134 S.W. 477, 142 Ky. 446, 1911 Ky. LEXIS 210 (Ky. Ct. App. 1911).

134 S.W. 477 (Anderson v. Commonwealth) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

King v. Commonwealth
136 S.W. 147 (Court of Appeals of Kentucky, 1911)