Anderson v. Comcast Ctr. Xfinity Home Sec.

Washington Supreme Court

Anderson v. Comcast Ctr. Xfinity Home Sec.

421 P.3d 448, 190 Wash. 2d 1026

CourtWashington Supreme Court

DecidedJuly 11, 2018

DocketNo. 95446-1

StatusPublished

This text of 421 P.3d 448 (Anderson v. Comcast Ctr. Xfinity Home Sec.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Washington Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Anderson v. Comcast Ctr. Xfinity Home Sec., 421 P.3d 448, 190 Wash. 2d 1026 (Wash. 2018).

Pincite

Opinion

¶ 1 Department II of the Court, composed of Chief Justice Fairhurst and Justices Madsen, Stephens, González and Yu, considered at its July 10, 2018, Motion Calendar whether review should be granted pursuant to RAP 13.4(b) and unanimously agreed that the following order be entered.

¶ 1 IT IS ORDERED:

¶ 1 The Petitioner's motion for extension of time is denied, and therefore the petition for review is dismissed as untimely.

¶ 1 For the Court

/s/ Fairhurst, C.J. CHIEF JUSTICE

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

¶ 1 Department II of the Court, composed of Chief Justice Fairhurst and Justices Madsen, Stephens, González and Yu, considered at its July 10, 2018, Motion Calendar whether review should be granted pursuant to RAP 13.4(b) and unanimously agreed that the following order be entered.

¶ 1 IT IS ORDERED:

¶ 1 The Petitioner's motion for extension of time is denied, and therefore the petition for review is dismissed as untimely.

¶ 1 For the Court

/s/ Fairhurst, C.J. CHIEF JUSTICE

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

421 P.3d 448, 190 Wash. 2d 1026, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/anderson-v-comcast-ctr-xfinity-home-sec-wash-2018.