Anderson v. Combes
This text of 4 A.D.2d 764 (Anderson v. Combes) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In an article 78 proceeding to review the action taken by respondent city clerk of the City of New Rochelle upon a referendum petition which appellants claim complies with section 34 of the Charter of the City of New Rochelle (Local Laws, 1932, No. 1, of City of New Rochelle), the appeal is from an order dismissing the petition in the article 78 proceeding and vacating a stay. The dismissal was not on the merits but on the ground that the proceeding was academic in view of the determination made in a companion action. (Elldnd v. City of New Bochelle, 5 Mise 2d 296.) Order unanimously affirmed, without costs. No opinion. (See Elldnd v. City of New Bochelle, 4 A D 2d 761.) Present — Nolan, P. J., Wenzel, Beldock, Hallinan and Kleinfeld, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
4 A.D.2d 764, 165 N.Y.S.2d 708, 1957 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4820, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/anderson-v-combes-nyappdiv-1957.