Anderson v. Colson
1 Neb. 172
Opinion
The pleadings show that there is a dispute who is treasurer of the school district. We cannot try that question upon an application for a mandamus. The applicant must first establish, by the proper process, his right to the office by which he claims the writ. Having done that, this application will be in order. Mr. Justice Curtis in ex rel. Goodrich v. Guthrie, secretary of the treasury, 17 Howard, 305. The petition is dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Anderson v. Colson, 1 Neb. 172 (Neb. 1871).
1 Neb. 172 (Anderson v. Colson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Goodwyn v. Sherer
40 So. 279 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1906)
Kokes v. State ex rel. Koupal
76 N.W. 467 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1898)
State ex rel. Hocknell v. Roper
65 N.W. 802 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1896)
State ex rel. Pomerene & Cooper v. Sabin
58 N.W. 178 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1894)
State ex rel. Beatty v. Mayor of Omaha
14 Neb. 265 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1883)
Knight v. Ferris
6 Del. 283 (Supreme Court of Delaware, 1881)
State ex rel. Mayor of David City v. Palmer
10 Neb. 203 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1880)
Duane v. McDonald
41 Conn. 517 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1874)