Anderson v. Clay
920 N.W.2d 374
This text of 920 N.W.2d 374 (Anderson v. Clay) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Anderson v. Clay, 920 N.W.2d 374 (Mich. 2018).
Opinion
On order of the Chief Justice, the motion of plaintiff-appellee to extend the time for filing her answer is GRANTED. The answer submitted on November 30, 2018, is accepted as timely filed. On further order of the Chief Justice, the motions of defendant-appellant for immediate consideration and to strike the answer are DENIED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
920 N.W.2d 374, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/anderson-v-clay-mich-2018.