Anderson v. Civil Service Commission

Missouri Court of Appeals

Anderson v. Civil Service Commission

502 S.W.3d 717, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 975, 2016 WL 5724844

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided October 4, 2016·No. ED 103954·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Corlett Anderson (Appellant) appeals from the judgment of the trial court affirming the decision of the Civil Service Commission of the City of St. Louis upholding her termination. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal, and we find Appellant’s claims of error to be without merit. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b) (2016).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Corlett Anderson (Appellant) appeals from the judgment of the trial court affirming the decision of the Civil Service Commission of the City of St. Louis upholding her termination. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal, and we find Appellant’s claims of error to be without merit. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b) (2016).

Anderson v. Civil Service Commission, 502 S.W.3d 717, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 975, 2016 WL 5724844 (Mo. Ct. App. 2016).

Pincite

502 S.W.3d 717 (Anderson v. Civil Service Commission) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.