Anderson v. Civil Service Commission

Missouri Court of Appeals

Anderson v. Civil Service Commission

502 S.W.3d 717, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 975, 2016 WL 5724844

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedOctober 4, 2016

DocketED 103954

StatusPublished

This text of 502 S.W.3d 717 (Anderson v. Civil Service Commission) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Anderson v. Civil Service Commission, 502 S.W.3d 717, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 975, 2016 WL 5724844 (Mo. Ct. App. 2016).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Corlett Anderson (Appellant) appeals from the judgment of the trial court affirming the decision of the Civil Service Commission of the City of St. Louis upholding her termination. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal, and we find Appellant’s claims of error to be without merit. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b) (2016).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Corlett Anderson (Appellant) appeals from the judgment of the trial court affirming the decision of the Civil Service Commission of the City of St. Louis upholding her termination. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal, and we find Appellant’s claims of error to be without merit. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b) (2016).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

502 S.W.3d 717, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 975, 2016 WL 5724844, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/anderson-v-civil-service-commission-moctapp-2016.