Anderson v. City of Fairmont Police Department
This text of 54 F. App'x 148 (Anderson v. City of Fairmont Police Department) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Dwayne Anderson appeals the district court’s amended order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Anderson v. City of Fairmont Police Dep’t, No. CA-01-130-1 (N.D.W.Va. July 12, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
54 F. App'x 148, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/anderson-v-city-of-fairmont-police-department-ca4-2002.