Anderson v. City of Fairmont Police Department
Opinion
Dwayne Anderson appeals the district court’s amended order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Anderson v. City of Fairmont Police Dep’t, No. CA-01-130-1 (N.D.W.Va. July 12, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
54 F. App'x 148 (Anderson v. City of Fairmont Police Department) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.