Anderson v. Carlson

Nebraska Supreme Court

Anderson v. Carlson

124 N.W. 145, 85 Neb. 711, 1910 Neb. LEXIS 6

CourtNebraska Supreme Court

DecidedJanuary 5, 1910

DocketNo. 15,881

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 124 N.W. 145 (Anderson v. Carlson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nebraska Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Anderson v. Carlson, 124 N.W. 145, 85 Neb. 711, 1910 Neb. LEXIS 6 (Neb. 1910).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Tliis was an action of forcible entry and detainer, instituted in the county court of Cedar county. The cause was appealed to the district court, and a jury trial was there had, which resulted in a verdict finding the defendant guilty. The record fails to show that any judgment was rendered thereon, or any final order of any kind entered. This being the state of the record, there is nothing upon which this court can act. The appeal is therefore dismissed as prematurely taken.-

Dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

Tliis was an action of forcible entry and detainer, instituted in the county court of Cedar county. The cause was appealed to the district court, and a jury trial was there had, which resulted in a verdict finding the defendant guilty. The record fails to show that any judgment was rendered thereon, or any final order of any kind entered. This being the state of the record, there is nothing upon which this court can act. The appeal is therefore dismissed as prematurely taken.-

Dismissed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

124 N.W. 145, 85 Neb. 711, 1910 Neb. LEXIS 6, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/anderson-v-carlson-neb-1910.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack