Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Anderson v. Carlozzi

Anderson v. Carlozzi

571 So. 2d 4, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 2912, 1990 WL 52313
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedApril 25, 1990
DocketNo. 89-00713
StatusPublished

This text of 571 So. 2d 4 (Anderson v. Carlozzi) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Anderson v. Carlozzi, 571 So. 2d 4, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 2912, 1990 WL 52313 (Fla. Ct. App. 1990).

Opinion

DANAHY, Acting Chief Judge.

The appellant, the defendant in the trial court, appeals an order denying a motion to vacate an order of default. We reverse because Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.500(c) specifically provides that if a party fails to plead or otherwise defend, the trial court may enter a default against such party. The appellant has demonstrated that he filed pleadings in this cause three months before the order of default was entered.

Reversed and remanded for further proceedings.

HALL and ALTENBERND, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Richard H. Lee v. Jane Lee, Born Barham
Louisiana Court of Appeal, 2004

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
571 So. 2d 4, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 2912, 1990 WL 52313, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/anderson-v-carlozzi-fladistctapp-1990.