Anderson v. Calkins
This text of 252 A.D. 836 (Anderson v. Calkins) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Judgment reversed on the law and a new trial granted, with costs to the appellant to abide the event. Memorandum: Plaintiff’s proof made out a prima facie ease. The question whether plaintiff was guilty of negligence contributing to the accident because his motorcycle with passenger truck attached was being operated with but one headlight in violation of section 43 of the Vehicle and Traffic Law, was one of fact for the jury. (Lewis v. Rowland, 225 App. Div. 25; Martin v. Herzog, 228 N. Y. 164.) All concur. (The judgment dismisses the complaint in an automobile negligence action.) Present — Bdgcomb, Crosby, Lewis, Cunningham and Taylor, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
252 A.D. 836, 298 N.Y.S. 986, 1937 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6409, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/anderson-v-calkins-nyappdiv-1937.