Anderson v. Brown
This text of 273 A.D. 940 (Anderson v. Brown) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order affirmed, without costs of this appeal to either party. Memorandum: In view of the disposition herein made, we do not at this time determine whether the six-year or the ten-year Statute of Limitations applies. That question may be raised again when the real situation is disclosed from the pleadings or by facts appearing upon the trial. (See Goldstein v. Schachne, 261 App. Div. 922; Hurley v. Hurley, 266 App. Div. 701.) All concur. (The order denies defendant’s motion to dismiss plaintiff’s complaint in an action to declare a quitclaim deed null and void.) Present — Taylor, P. J., McCurn, Love, Vaughan and Kimball, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
273 A.D. 940, 77 N.Y.S.2d 917, 1948 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5360, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/anderson-v-brown-nyappdiv-1948.