Anderson v. Brooks-Scanlon Lumber Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Anderson v. Brooks-Scanlon Lumber Co.

138 N.W. 1033, 119 Minn. 542, 1912 Minn. LEXIS 528

CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota

DecidedNovember 29, 1912

DocketNos. 17,850—(79)

StatusPublished

This text of 138 N.W. 1033 (Anderson v. Brooks-Scanlon Lumber Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Minnesota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Anderson v. Brooks-Scanlon Lumber Co., 138 N.W. 1033, 119 Minn. 542, 1912 Minn. LEXIS 528 (Mich. 1912).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The complaint in this action, though flagrantly indefinite and uncertain and open to a motion to make its allegations more specific, and in default thereof that it be stricken out, is not demurrable. By permissible inferences the complaint states a cause of action, if in no other respects, for the negligent failure of defendant to provide plaintiff with a safe place in which to do his work.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The complaint in this action, though flagrantly indefinite and uncertain and open to a motion to make its allegations more specific, and in default thereof that it be stricken out, is not demurrable. By permissible inferences the complaint states a cause of action, if in no other respects, for the negligent failure of defendant to provide plaintiff with a safe place in which to do his work.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

138 N.W. 1033, 119 Minn. 542, 1912 Minn. LEXIS 528, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/anderson-v-brooks-scanlon-lumber-co-minn-1912.