Anderson v. Brodie

Opinion

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FILED

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT NOV 21 2019

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U.S. COURT OF APPEALS In re: MICHAEL T. ANDERSON. No. 19-72546 ______________________________ D.C. No. 9:19-cv-00095-DLC MICHAEL T. ANDERSON, District of Montana, Missoula Petitioner, ORDER v.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MONTANA, MISSOULA,

Respondent,

SCOTT BRODIE; et al.,

Real Parties in Interest.

Before: BYBEE, IKUTA, and OWENS, Circuit Judges.

Petitioner has not demonstrated that this case warrants the intervention of the court by means of the extraordinary remedy of mandamus. See Bauman v. U.S. Dist. Ct., 557 F.2d 650 (9th Cir. 1977). Accordingly, the petition is denied. No further filings will be accepted in this closed case. DENIED.