Anderson v. Brodie

D. Montana

Anderson v. Brodie

DecidedNovember 21, 2019

Docket9:19-cv-00095

StatusUnknown

This text of Anderson v. Brodie (Anderson v. Brodie) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, D. Montana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Anderson v. Brodie, (D. Mont. 2019).

Pincite

Opinion

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FILED

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT NOV 21 2019

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U.S. COURT OF APPEALS In re: MICHAEL T. ANDERSON. No. 19-72546 ______________________________ D.C. No. 9:19-cv-00095-DLC MICHAEL T. ANDERSON, District of Montana, Missoula Petitioner, ORDER v.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MONTANA, MISSOULA,

Respondent,

SCOTT BRODIE; et al.,

Real Parties in Interest.

Before: BYBEE, IKUTA, and OWENS, Circuit Judges.

Petitioner has not demonstrated that this case warrants the intervention of the court by means of the extraordinary remedy of mandamus. See Bauman v. U.S. Dist. Ct., 557 F.2d 650 (9th Cir. 1977). Accordingly, the petition is denied. No further filings will be accepted in this closed case. DENIED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI