Anderson v. Broad Street National Bank
This text of 109 A. 205 (Anderson v. Broad Street National Bank) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
We concur in the view expressed by the learned vice-chancellor in his opinion filed in this cause, that the case is indistinguishable in principle from Sullivan v. Maroney, 77 N. J. Eq. 565, and that that decision is therefore controlling.
The decree will be affirmed.
[332]*332For. affirm cunee — The Chief-Justice, Sway.ze, Trenchard, Parker, Bergen, Mtnturn, Kalisci-i, Black, White, HepPENHEniEB, Williams, Taylor, Gardner, Ackerson — 14.
For reversal — None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
109 A. 205, 91 N.J. Eq. 331, 6 Stock. 331, 1920 N.J. LEXIS 295, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/anderson-v-broad-street-national-bank-nj-1920.