Anderson v. . Bridgers

184 S.E. 78, 209 N.C. 456, 1936 N.C. LEXIS 269
CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina
DecidedFebruary 26, 1936
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 184 S.E. 78 (Anderson v. . Bridgers) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Anderson v. . Bridgers, 184 S.E. 78, 209 N.C. 456, 1936 N.C. LEXIS 269 (N.C. 1936).

Opinion

DEVIN, J., took no part in the consideration or decision of this case. O. L. Pittman died on 1 April, 1930, leaving a last will and testament and codicils, which were filed and probated on 9 April, 1930. Plaintiff duly qualified as executor of the estate of said testator before the clerk of the Superior Court of Edgecombe County, N.C. on 9 April, 1930, and at once entered upon the administration of his testator's estate.

This is an action, brought by plaintiff against the defendants, devisees and legatees of the last will and testament of O. L. Pittman, deceased, to sell land to pay the debts of the estate. After exhausting the personal property, the outstanding debts amount to the sum of about $9,000. *Page 458 Commissioners were appointed and the land duly sold. After the payment of debts, this controversy concerns how the remainder should be distributed under the last will and testament of O. L. Pittman.

On this appeal, the paragraphs of the will and codicils to be construed are as follows:

Paragraph 6, in part, is as follows: "It is my desire and intention to so distribute my estate by this my will as to give my wife one-third of my estate, my brother, J. H. Pittman, during his life, and then to his children, one-ninth of my estate, the children of my deceased brother, Bisco Pittman, one-ninth of my estate, and my sister, Carolina Anderson, during her life and then to her children, one-ninth of my estate, including herein the $1,175.00 given to her son, H. O. Anderson, in Item 5 of this my will, and to religious and charitable purposes, one-third of my estate."

Paragraph 7 is as follows: "I give, devise, and bequeath all the rest and residue of my estate, of any kind and description, which I estimate to be about $15,000.00, to W. C. Tyree, J. P. Hackney, Noah Biggs, W. N. Jones, and D. L. Grove, trustees of the State Baptist Convention, and their successors in office, to be by them held upon the following uses and trusts, viz.: one-third thereof shall be invested in good interest-bearing securities or loans and the interest and profits thereof be paid annually to the Baptist State Mission Board, to be by them used in their discretion in aid of weak churches within the limits of the Roanoke Association. One-third thereof shall be invested in good interest-bearing securities or loans and the interests and profits thereof be paid annually to the Board of Managers of the Thomasville Orphanage, to be used by them in their discretion in the aid and support of that branch of said orphanage known as the Kennedy Home. One-third thereof shall be invested in good interest-bearing securities or loans and the interest thereof paid annually to the deacons, or those in charge, of the Gethsemane Baptist Church at Cherry's Cross Roads, in No. 6 Township, Edgecombe County, North Carolina, to be used by them in the repair of the church and in maintaining the churchyard or cemetery around the church, and should there be more than sufficient for these purposes, such surplus they shall pay on the salary of the pastor of that church. But should the said Gethsemane Church be permitted to go down and to be abandoned, then and in that event the bequest for its benefit shall terminate, and the third of the residue of my estate herein given said trustees for the benefit of said church shall revert to my estate."

The will was made and executed on 25 April, 1913. A codicil was made 31 July, 1924, and another codicil was made 26 February, 1927, which, in part, is as follows: "I, O. L. Pittman, of the county and State aforesaid, do hereby make this codicil to my last will and testament *Page 459 made by me and dated on the 25th day of April, 1913, which I hereby ratify and confirm, except as the same shall be changed hereby. . . . (8) Since in my will and testament I have directed that one-third of my entire estate to be given to religious and charitable purposes without specifying the names of such religious and charitable institutions, it is therefore my will and desire and I do hereby give and bequeath and devise one-third part of myentire estate to the said W. C. Tyree, J. P. Hackney, Noah Biggs, W. N. Jones, and D. L. Grove, trustee of the State Baptist Convention, and their successors in office, to be held in trust and used as directed in Item 7 of my will and testament." (Italics ours.)

Dr. William Louis Poteat, F. H. Brooks, and R. L. McMillan, trustees of the North Carolina Baptist State Convention, in their answer say, in part:

"That it appears clear to these answering defendants that the testator intended that the trustees of the Baptist State Convention have and receive under and by virtue of his will one-third of his entire estate, and that according to the allegations and prayer for judgment in the petition herein, the said trustees of the North Carolina Baptist State Convention will receive nothing under the terms and conditions of said will.

"That the executor of said will has undertaken to set forth an interpretation of the same, evidently under and by virtue of the provisions of sections 87 and 88 of the Consolidated Statutes of the State of North Carolina, which interpretation these answering defendants say is improper, and not in keeping with the intention of the testator clearly expressed both in the original will and in the second codicil, and is not in keeping with the provisions of the law of the State of North Carolina; that these answering defendants state that the executor of said will should not take it upon himself to interpret the will clearly in favor of certain devisees and against the interest of other devisees named in said will, and knowing that the interpretation of the will, the provisions of which are seriously contested as in this case, is the duty and within the province of the court, these answering defendants pray that this will be interpreted by the court, and that the sale of any of said real estate by the executor or by any one for him or in his behalf be stayed until such interpretation is had.

"That according to the interpretation of the will placed thereon by the executor of the estate in his petition, the trustees of the North Carolina Baptist State Convention would be eliminated and would not share or participate in the assets of said estate, when in truth and in fact it appears both in the original will and in said codicil thereto that the testator clearly intended that the said trustees would have and receive *Page 460 one-third of the entire estate after the payment of debts from the proceeds of real estate, if this became necessary, as it now appears is necessary, and it clearly appears from said will as the intention of the testator that there are no special bequests or devises in the said will having any advantages or taking any priority whatsoever over and above any other bequests or devises, and these answering defendants respectfully pray and urge that the court interpret this will setting forth the intention of the testator to the effect that said trustees will share equally in said estate according to the terms of said will, receiving one-third of said estate after the payment of debts, and that by proper decrees the court direct and instruct the executor to proceed accordingly.

"Wherefore, the said William Louis Poteat, F. H. Brooks, and R. L. McMillan, trustees of the North Carolina Baptist State Convention, pray for judgment:

"First: That this proceeding be placed before the judge of this court for the interpretation of said will;

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hubbard v. Wiggins
81 S.E.2d 630 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1954)
Elmore v. Austin
59 S.E.2d 205 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1950)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
184 S.E. 78, 209 N.C. 456, 1936 N.C. LEXIS 269, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/anderson-v-bridgers-nc-1936.