Anderson v. Board of Parole
This text of 331 Or. App. 476 (Anderson v. Board of Parole) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
476 March 6, 2024 No. 170
This is a nonprecedential memorandum opinion pursuant to ORAP 10.30 and may not be cited except as provided in ORAP 10.30(1).
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF OREGON
JAMES M. ANDERSON, Petitioner, v. BOARD OF PAROLE AND POST-PRISON SUPERVISION, Respondent. Board of Parole and Post-Prison Supervision A180092
Argued and submitted February 8, 2024. Walter Fonseca argued the cause and filed the reply brief for petitioner. Also on the opening brief was Thaddeus Betz. Denise Fjordbeck, Assistant Attorney General, argued the cause for respondent. On the brief were Ellen F. Rosenblum, Attorney General, Benjamin Gutman, Solicitor General, and Robert M. Wilsey, Assistant Attorney General. Before Tookey, Presiding Judge, Egan, Judge, and Kamins, Judge. PER CURIAM Affirmed. State v. Hubbard, 290 Or App 640, 417 P3d 498, rev den, 363 Or 283 (2018); State v. Haynes, 168 Or App 565, 7 P3d 623, rev den, 331 Or 283 (2000).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
331 Or. App. 476, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/anderson-v-board-of-parole-orctapp-2024.