Anderson v. Bishop Loverde
Opinion
1 2 3
4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT TACOMA 7 RUTH MARIE ANDERSON, Case No. 3:25-cv-05480-TMC 8 Plaintiff, ORDER DISMISSING COMPLAINT 9 WIHTOUT PREJUDICE FOR FAILURE TO v. PROSECUTE 10 BISHOP LOVERDE, et al., 11 Defendant. 12 13
14 I. ORDER 15 On June 2, 2025, Plaintiff Ruth Marie Anderson initiated this case by filling a motion for 16 leave to proceed in forma pauperis (IFP). Dkt. 1. On June 4, Magistrate Judge Theresa L. Fricke 17 issued an order to show cause. Dkt. 4. Judge Fricke explained that Ms. Anderson’s application to 18 proceed IFP was insufficient to determine if she was unable to pay the $405 filing fee. Id. at 1. 19 Judge Fricke specified the various information missing from Ms. Anderson’s motion. Id. at 1–2. 20 Judge Fricke ordered Ms. Anderson to file a revised IFP application with the necessary 21 information on or before June 24, 2025. Id. at 2. Judge Fricke informed Ms. Anderson that 22 failure to comply with the order to show case could result in dismissal. Id. The deadline has 23 passed, and Ms. Anderson has not responded to the Court’s order nor made any further filings. 24 l Accordingly, the Court dismisses this case without prejudice for failure to prosecute. See 2 R. Civ. P. 41(b) (allowing for involuntary dismissal for failure to prosecute or failure to 3 comply with the federal rules or court orders); Hells Canyon Pres. Council v. U.S. Forest Serv., 4 F.3d 683, 689 (9th Cir. 2005) (courts may dismiss cases sua sponte pursuant to Rule 41(b) 5 for failure to prosecute); Oliva v. Sullivan, 958 F.2d 272, 274 (9th Cir. 1992) (“The district judge 6 || has an obligation to warn the plaintiff that dismissal is imminent.”); Haynes v. Hanson, 695 F. 7 || App’x 317, 318 (9th Cir. 2017) (upholding dismissal of case for failure to prosecute where the g || plaintiff “fail[ed] to effectuate service of process”). 9 The Clerk is directed to send uncertified copies of this Order to all counsel of record and 10 || to any party appearing pro se at said party’s last known address. 11 Dated this 31st day of July, 2025. 12 aor CC 13 Tiffany M. Cartwright United States District Judge 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Anderson v. Bishop Loverde (Anderson v. Bishop Loverde) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.