Anderson v. Berryhill

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

THERESA A. ANDERSON,

Plaintiff, No. 18-12008

v. Honorable Nancy G. Edmunds

COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY,

Defendant. ________________________________________/

OPINION AND ORDER ACCEPTING AND ADOPTING THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S JULY 31, 2019 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION [24]

Currently before the Court is the magistrate judge’s July 31, 2019 report and recommendation (Dkt. 24). The magistrate judge recommends granting Plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment, denying Defendant’s motion for summary judgment, and remanding the case to the administrative law judge for further proceedings. The Court is fully advised in the premises and has reviewed the record and the pleadings. Neither party has filed objections. “[T]he failure to object to the magistrate judge’s report[] releases the Court from its duty to independently review the matter.” Hall v. Rawal, No. 09-10933, 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 120541, at *2 (E.D. Mich. Aug. 24, 2012) (citing Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149 (1985)). The Court nevertheless agrees with the magistrate judge’s recommendation. The Court therefore ACCEPTS and ADOPTS the magistrate judge’s report and recommendation (Dkt. 24). It is further ordered that Plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment (Dkt. 17) is GRANTED; Defendant’s motion for summary judgment (Dkt. 21) is DENIED; the decision of the Commissioner is REVERSED; and this matter is REMANDED to the administrative law judge pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) for further proceedings consistent with the magistrate judge’s report and recommendation. SO ORDERED. s/Nancy G. Edmunds Nancy G. Edmunds United States District Judge

Dated: August 20, 2019

I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was served upon counsel of record on August 20, 2019, by electronic and/or ordinary mail.

s/Lisa Bartlett Case Manager