Anderson v. Benson Power, LLC
Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA
MELISSA L. ANDERSON,
Plaintiff,
v. ORDER Civil File No. 19-53 (MJD/BRT)
NAES CORPORATION,
Defendant and Third-Party Plaintiff,
v.
MECHANICAL SYSTEMS, INC.,
Third-Party Defendant.
Michael A. Bryant, Bradshaw & Bryant PLLC, Counsel for Melissa L. Anderson.
Scott P. Drawe, Drawe & Maland, Counsel for NAES, Inc.
Timothy S. Poeschl, Grotefeld Hoffman, Counsel for Mechanical Systems, Inc.
The above-entitled matter comes before the Court upon the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Becky R. Thorson dated June 8, 2020. No objections have been filed to the Report and Recommendation in the time period permitted. When no objections are filed within the filing period, the Court reviews the Report and Recommendation for “clear error.” Grinder v.
Gammon, 73 F.3d 793, 795 (8th Cir. 1996). Accordingly, based upon the Report & Recommendation, files, records, and proceedings herein, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED:
1. The Court ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Becky R. Thorson dated June 8, 2020 [Docket No. 58].
2. NAES’s First Motion for Partial Summary Judgement [Docket No. 40] is DENIED.
3. NAES’s Motion to Strike Pleading [Docket No. 52] is DENIED.
4. MSI’s request to extend the deadline to submit the Errata Sheet is DENIED.
Dated: July 8, 2020 s/ Michael J. Davis Michael J. Davis United States District Court
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Anderson v. Benson Power, LLC (Anderson v. Benson Power, LLC) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.