Anderson v. Beck

64 Miss. 113
CourtMississippi Supreme Court
DecidedOctober 15, 1886
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 64 Miss. 113 (Anderson v. Beck) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Mississippi Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Anderson v. Beck, 64 Miss. 113 (Mich. 1886).

Opinion

Campbell, J.,

delivered the opinion of the court.

The amended declaration avers the imprisonment by the defendant of the plaintiff for more than thirty days under a pretended warrant Calling it a pretended warrant does not make it so, it is true, but a real and legal warrant is not authority for such imprisonment as is charged, at least prima facie it is not, and the facts stated are sufficient to require an answer. A warrant is process for the arrest of a person, who, when arrested, should be taken before an officer authorized to inquire into the cause of arrest, and the unexplained detention of the party by virtue of process for his arrest without any mittimus was a cause of action.

The demurrer to the amended declaration should have been overruled.

[115]*115 Judgment reversed, the demurrer to the amended declaration overruled, and oause remanded for further ’proceedings in the circuit COV/l't.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Oxford v. Berry
170 N.W. 83 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1918)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
64 Miss. 113, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/anderson-v-beck-miss-1886.