Anderson v. Arkansas Department of Human Services

Eighth Circuit

Anderson v. Arkansas Department of Human Services

21 F. App'x 526

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

DecidedOctober 26, 2001

DocketNo. PER

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 21 F. App'x 526 (Anderson v. Arkansas Department of Human Services) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Anderson v. Arkansas Department of Human Services, 21 F. App'x 526 (8th Cir. 2001).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

In this appeal following an adverse jury verdict in her retaliation and race discrimination action, Rose Anderson challenges the sufficiency of the evidence. After careful consideration of the record before us and the parties’ submissions on appeal, we find the appeal meritless and affirm the judgment of the District Court,¹ because there is no basis whatsoever for upsetting the jury’s verdict.

Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

In this appeal following an adverse jury verdict in her retaliation and race discrimination action, Rose Anderson challenges the sufficiency of the evidence. After careful consideration of the record before us and the parties’ submissions on appeal, we find the appeal meritless and affirm the judgment of the District Court,¹ because there is no basis whatsoever for upsetting the jury’s verdict.

Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

21 F. App'x 526, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/anderson-v-arkansas-department-of-human-services-ca8-2001.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack