Anderson v. Arkansas Department of Human Services

Eighth Circuit

Anderson v. Arkansas Department of Human Services

21 F. App'x 526

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit·Decided October 26, 2001·No. No. PER·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

In this appeal following an adverse jury verdict in her retaliation and race discrimination action, Rose Anderson challenges the sufficiency of the evidence. After careful consideration of the record before us and the parties’ submissions on appeal, we find the appeal meritless and affirm the judgment of the District Court,¹ because there is no basis whatsoever for upsetting the jury’s verdict.

Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

Footnotes

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

In this appeal following an adverse jury verdict in her retaliation and race discrimination action, Rose Anderson challenges the sufficiency of the evidence. After careful consideration of the record before us and the parties’ submissions on appeal, we find the appeal meritless and affirm the judgment of the District Court,¹ because there is no basis whatsoever for upsetting the jury’s verdict.

Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

Footnotes

Anderson v. Arkansas Department of Human Services, 21 F. App'x 526 (8th Cir. 2001).

Pincite

21 F. App'x 526 (Anderson v. Arkansas Department of Human Services) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Footnotes

Related