Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Anderson v. Aramark Food Corp.

Anderson v. Aramark Food Corp.

892 So. 2d 551, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 648, 2005 WL 181618
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJanuary 28, 2005
DocketNo. 1D04-1488
StatusPublished

This text of 892 So. 2d 551 (Anderson v. Aramark Food Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Anderson v. Aramark Food Corp., 892 So. 2d 551, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 648, 2005 WL 181618 (Fla. Ct. App. 2005).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Michael Anderson petitions this court for a writ of mandamus, seeking an order which would compel the Circuit Court for Jackson County to render a ruling on the mandamus petition which is now pending in that forum. Respondent points out that actions which followed the filing of the circuit court petition have rendered it moot. Even if that is so, it is a basis for the circuit court to deny relief, but the case may not be left pending indefinitely. See Kramp v. Fagan, 568 So.2d 479 (Fla. 1st DCA 1990). Accordingly, we grant the petition and order the circuit court to dispose of Anderson’s mandamus petition within a reasonable time, not to exceed 30 days from issuance of mandate in this cause.

PETITION GRANTED.

KAHN, BENTON, and PADOVANO, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Kramp v. Fagan
568 So. 2d 479 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1990)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
892 So. 2d 551, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 648, 2005 WL 181618, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/anderson-v-aramark-food-corp-fladistctapp-2005.