Anderson v. Anderson

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Anderson v. Anderson

142 P.3d 121, 207 Or. App. 514, 2006 Ore. App. LEXIS 1238

CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon

DecidedAugust 30, 2006

Docket0306-06280, 0412-12488; A127330, A129219

StatusPublished

This text of 142 P.3d 121 (Anderson v. Anderson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Anderson v. Anderson, 142 P.3d 121, 207 Or. App. 514, 2006 Ore. App. LEXIS 1238 (Or. Ct. App. 2006).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM

In these consolidated cases, plaintiff raises numerous assignments of error regarding the dismissal of his negligence claims brought against defendant. We reject without discussion all of plaintiffs assignments of error except his assignment of error concerning the trial court’s entry of a general judgment of dismissal with prejudice in Multnomah County case number 0306-06280 (appellate case number A127330). Plaintiff asserts, and defendant concedes, that that judgment, entered on January 10, 2005, was erroneous because a final judgment had already been entered in that case. A discussion of the details underlying this dispute would be of no benefit to the bench and Bar. On review, we agree with the parties that the January 10, 2005, judgment was entered erroneously.

In case A127330, remanded with instructions to vacate January 10, 2005, judgment and reinstate prior judgment; in case A129219, affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM

In these consolidated cases, plaintiff raises numerous assignments of error regarding the dismissal of his negligence claims brought against defendant. We reject without discussion all of plaintiffs assignments of error except his assignment of error concerning the trial court’s entry of a general judgment of dismissal with prejudice in Multnomah County case number 0306-06280 (appellate case number A127330). Plaintiff asserts, and defendant concedes, that that judgment, entered on January 10, 2005, was erroneous because a final judgment had already been entered in that case. A discussion of the details underlying this dispute would be of no benefit to the bench and Bar. On review, we agree with the parties that the January 10, 2005, judgment was entered erroneously.

In case A127330, remanded with instructions to vacate January 10, 2005, judgment and reinstate prior judgment; in case A129219, affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

142 P.3d 121, 207 Or. App. 514, 2006 Ore. App. LEXIS 1238, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/anderson-v-anderson-orctapp-2006.