Anderson v. Anderson

26 N.Y.S. 492, 74 Hun 56, 81 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 56, 57 N.Y. St. Rep. 868
CourtNew York Supreme Court
DecidedDecember 1, 1893
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 26 N.Y.S. 492 (Anderson v. Anderson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Anderson v. Anderson, 26 N.Y.S. 492, 74 Hun 56, 81 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 56, 57 N.Y. St. Rep. 868 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1893).

Opinions

PRATT, J.

The only questions being of fact, and the trial judge •having seen the witnesses and personally heard the testimony, a very strong preponderance of evidence against the decisions would be required" to enable us to interfere upon appeal. We do not think it can be said that the judgment is unsupported, by any testimony. The trial judge believed the evidence of the plaintiff, and we cannot say he was wrong in so doing. The judgment does not reflect upon the appellant, who was not a party to the duress. Judgment affirmed, without costs.

DYKMAN, J., concurs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Seyitoglu v. Seyitoglu
53 A.D.2d 606 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1976)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
26 N.Y.S. 492, 74 Hun 56, 81 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 56, 57 N.Y. St. Rep. 868, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/anderson-v-anderson-nysupct-1893.