Anderson v. Anderson

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Anderson v. Anderson

192 A.D.2d 1139, 598 N.Y.S.2d 744

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 14, 1993

StatusPublished

This text of 192 A.D.2d 1139 (Anderson v. Anderson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Anderson v. Anderson, 192 A.D.2d 1139, 598 N.Y.S.2d 744 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1993).

Pincite

Opinion

—Motion insofar as it requests permission for counsel to withdraw granted and motion otherwise denied as unnecessary. Memorandum: Respondents’ motion for an extension of time is unnecessary because appellant has not filed an original stipulated or settled record and the demand served is therefore ineffective. Present: Callahan, J. P., Green, Fallon, Doerr and Boomer, JJ. (Filed Apr. 7, 1993.)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Motion insofar as it requests permission for counsel to withdraw granted and motion otherwise denied as unnecessary. Memorandum: Respondents’ motion for an extension of time is unnecessary because appellant has not filed an original stipulated or settled record and the demand served is therefore ineffective. Present: Callahan, J. P., Green, Fallon, Doerr and Boomer, JJ. (Filed Apr. 7, 1993.)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

192 A.D.2d 1139, 598 N.Y.S.2d 744, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/anderson-v-anderson-nyappdiv-1993.