Anderson v. Anderson

25 A.D.2d 512, 267 N.Y.S.2d 75, 1966 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4944
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedFebruary 15, 1966
StatusPublished
Cited by8 cases

This text of 25 A.D.2d 512 (Anderson v. Anderson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Anderson v. Anderson, 25 A.D.2d 512, 267 N.Y.S.2d 75, 1966 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4944 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1966).

Opinion

Order of commitment for violation of family offense order, entered November 16, 1965, unanimously reversed on the law, and the proceedings remanded to Family Court with leave to amend the petition or to make and file a supplemental petition, and for reconsideration of any punishment imposed, without costs or disbursements to either party. While Family Court proceedings are permitted to be informal, due process considerations require that a commitment be based on a petition alleging the facts supporting the commitment (Family Ct. Act, §§ 821, 827). In this ease, the only petition filed was for an event in May, 1965 which petitioner wife had abandoned and which the hearing court observed was no longer applicable. Because of serious misconduct charged to the husband and his flagrant violation of the temporary order, however lacking as it was in a proper pleading basis, the proceedings should be remanded so that the court may provide the protection needed by petitioner wife. In passing, it is observed that the 90-day sentence may have been excessive, especially if consideration be given to maintaining the respondent husband’s capacity to support petitioner wife.

Concur — Breitel, J. P., Rabin, MeNally and Steuer, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Matter of Ferratella v. Thomas
2019 NY Slip Op 5282 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2019)
Matter of Sasha R. v. Alberto A.
127 A.D.3d 567 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2015)
Felicia W. v. Chandler C.
9 A.D.3d 830 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2004)
Whittemore v. Lloyd
266 A.D.2d 305 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1999)
Jones v. Roper
187 A.D.2d 593 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1992)
Raucci v. Town of Rotterdam
902 F.2d 1050 (Second Circuit, 1990)
Figueroa v. Figueroa
160 A.D.2d 390 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1990)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
25 A.D.2d 512, 267 N.Y.S.2d 75, 1966 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4944, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/anderson-v-anderson-nyappdiv-1966.