Anderson v. Anderson
This text of 2025 ND 117 (Anderson v. Anderson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering North Dakota Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA
2025 ND 117
Vaughn Anderson, Plaintiff and Appellant v. Amber Anderson, Defendant and Appellee
No. 20240343
Appeal from the District Court of Stark County, Southwest Judicial District, the Honorable Rhonda R. Ehlis, Judge.
AFFIRMED.
Per Curiam.
Jami L. Haynes, Dickinson, ND, for plaintiff and appellant; on brief.
Erica J. Shively, Bismarck, ND, for defendant and appellee; on brief. Anderson v. Anderson No. 20240343
[¶1] Vaughn Anderson appeals from a divorce judgment. Vaughn Anderson argues the district court erred in awarding Amber Anderson primary residential responsibility and in its valuation of assets and debts. We conclude the award of primary residential responsibility and valuation of the parties’ marital estate is not clearly erroneous. We summarily affirm the divorce judgment under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2) and deny Amber Anderson’s request for attorney’s fees on appeal.
[¶2] Jon J. Jensen, C.J. Daniel J. Crothers Lisa Fair McEvers Jerod E. Tufte Douglas A. Bahr
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2025 ND 117, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/anderson-v-anderson-nd-2025.