Anderson v. Anderson

Missouri Court of Appeals

Anderson v. Anderson

131 S.W.3d 368, 2004 Mo. App. LEXIS 31, 2004 WL 57277

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Anderson v. Anderson. Read the opinion of the Court — 2001 Mo. App. LEXIS 1602 →

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided January 13, 2004·No. No. ED 82043·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Eric Anderson appeals the trial court’s judgment and decree of dissolution. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of [369]*369law. An extended opinion would be of no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties only setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Eric Anderson appeals the trial court’s judgment and decree of dissolution. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of [369]*369law. An extended opinion would be of no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties only setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Anderson v. Anderson, 131 S.W.3d 368, 2004 Mo. App. LEXIS 31, 2004 WL 57277 (Mo. Ct. App. 2004).

Pincite

131 S.W.3d 368 (Anderson v. Anderson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.