Anderson v. Anderson
This text of 4 Me. 100 (Anderson v. Anderson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Judicial Court of Maine primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
But the Court overruled this objection, deeming the record of the conviction as sufficient proof of that fact.
The respondent then proved that the libellant had forgiven his offence, by subsequent cohabitation, with knowledge of the crime.
[101]*101Whereupon JJlden moved for leave to amend the libel, by adding a charge of extreme cruelty, and praying for a divorce a mensa el thoro for that cause.
Which the Couet granted, ordering that the libel, as amended, be served on the adverse party three months before the next term.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
4 Me. 100, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/anderson-v-anderson-me-1826.