Anderson v. Anderson

242 S.E.2d 593, 240 Ga. 795, 1978 Ga. LEXIS 831
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedFebruary 22, 1978
Docket33128
StatusPublished
Cited by17 cases

This text of 242 S.E.2d 593 (Anderson v. Anderson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Anderson v. Anderson, 242 S.E.2d 593, 240 Ga. 795, 1978 Ga. LEXIS 831 (Ga. 1978).

Opinion

Marshall, Justice.

This is an appeal by the wife in a divorce action from that portion of the divorce decree which gave the husband permanent custody of the parties’ two minor sons, custody of whom had been lodged temporarily in the wife pursuant to an agreement of the parties.

1. The admission in evidence of certain letters, even if error, was not reversible error, in view of the holding in Division 2 of this opinion.

2. "In a contest between parents over the custody of a child, the trial court has a very broad discretion, looking always to the best interest of the child, and may award the child to one even though the other may not be an unfit person to exercise custody or had not otherwise lost the right to custody... Where in such a case the trial judge has exercised his discretion, this court will not interfere unless the evidence shows a clear abuse thereof. . . In a case such as this, it is the duty of the trial judge to resolve the conflicts in the evidence, and where there is any *796 evidence to support his finding it cannot be said by this court that there was an abuse of discretion on the part of the trial judge in awarding custody of the minor child to the father.” Jackson v. Jackson, 230 Ga. 499 (197 SE2d 705) (1973) and cits.

Argued January 16, 1978 Decided February 22, 1978. Page, Scrantom, Harris, McGlamry & Chapman, Joan Swift, for appellant. Keil & Davis, B. Seth Harp, Jr., for appellee.

After a careful review of the record we find no abuse of discretion in the award. See Morris v. Morris, 238 Ga. 291 (232 SE2d 920) (1977).

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur, except Hall, J., who dissents.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Patel v. Patel
577 S.E.2d 587 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 2003)
Urquhart v. Urquhart
533 S.E.2d 80 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 2000)
Wrightson v. Wrightson
467 S.E.2d 578 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1996)
In the Matter of J. S. S.
333 S.E.2d 417 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1985)
Matter of Jss
333 S.E.2d 417 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1985)
In re J. C. P.
167 Ga. App. 572 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1983)
In Re JCP
307 S.E.2d 1 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1983)
Brand v. Brand
259 S.E.2d 133 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1979)
Brown v. Brown
254 S.E.2d 371 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1979)
Higbee v. Tuck
249 S.E.2d 62 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1978)
Rude v. Rude
246 S.E.2d 311 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1978)
Silverstein v. Silverstein
245 S.E.2d 437 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1978)
Gazaway v. Brackett
244 S.E.2d 238 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1978)
Sullivan v. Sullivan
243 S.E.2d 35 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1978)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
242 S.E.2d 593, 240 Ga. 795, 1978 Ga. LEXIS 831, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/anderson-v-anderson-ga-1978.