Anderson v. Anderson

Supreme Court of Georgia

Anderson v. Anderson

152 S.E.2d 379, 222 Ga. 769, 1966 Ga. LEXIS 622

CourtSupreme Court of Georgia

DecidedNovember 23, 1966

Docket23761

StatusPublished

This text of 152 S.E.2d 379 (Anderson v. Anderson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Anderson v. Anderson, 152 S.E.2d 379, 222 Ga. 769, 1966 Ga. LEXIS 622 (Ga. 1966).

Pincite

Opinion

Nichols, Justice.

1. Where as in the case sub judice the evidence is conflicting as to all material issues in the case, the trial judge’s discretion in granting the husband a divorce, giving him custody of the child and denying alimony to the mother, will not be controlled.

2. We need not determine whether the trial judge erred in dismissing a certain individual as a party to the case. This is true since the sole question involving that party was whether he was holding property which was in actuality the husband’s so as to be subject to the wife’s claim for alimony and here the wife was not awarded alimony. Hence, this specification of error is moot.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Nichols, Justice.

1. Where as in the case sub judice the evidence is conflicting as to all material issues in the case, the trial judge’s discretion in granting the husband a divorce, giving him custody of the child and denying alimony to the mother, will not be controlled.

2. We need not determine whether the trial judge erred in dismissing a certain individual as a party to the case. This is true since the sole question involving that party was whether he was holding property which was in actuality the husband’s so as to be subject to the wife’s claim for alimony and here the wife was not awarded alimony. Hence, this specification of error is moot.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

152 S.E.2d 379, 222 Ga. 769, 1966 Ga. LEXIS 622, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/anderson-v-anderson-ga-1966.