Anderson v. Anderson

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Anderson v. Anderson

707 So. 2d 373, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 1334, 1998 WL 62886

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedFebruary 18, 1998

DocketNo. 97-00546

StatusPublished

This text of 707 So. 2d 373 (Anderson v. Anderson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Anderson v. Anderson, 707 So. 2d 373, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 1334, 1998 WL 62886 (Fla. Ct. App. 1998).

Pincite

Opinion

PATTERSON, Judge.

The husband in this divorce proceeding challenges the trial court’s distribution of assets in the final judgment of dissolution of marriage. We agree with his argument that the trial court erred in dividing the parties’ assets unequally without providing written factual findings to support the disparate distribution. See Lavelle v. Lavelle, 634 So.2d 1111 (Fla. 2d DCA 1994). Therefore, we remand to the trial court for the equal distribution of assets or the entry of written findings. We find no merit to the wife’s issue on cross-appeal and affirm as to that issue.

Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded.

PARKER, C.J., and FULMER, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PATTERSON, Judge.

The husband in this divorce proceeding challenges the trial court’s distribution of assets in the final judgment of dissolution of marriage. We agree with his argument that the trial court erred in dividing the parties’ assets unequally without providing written factual findings to support the disparate distribution. See Lavelle v. Lavelle, 634 So.2d 1111 (Fla. 2d DCA 1994). Therefore, we remand to the trial court for the equal distribution of assets or the entry of written findings. We find no merit to the wife’s issue on cross-appeal and affirm as to that issue.

Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded.

PARKER, C.J., and FULMER, J., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

707 So. 2d 373, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 1334, 1998 WL 62886, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/anderson-v-anderson-fladistctapp-1998.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack