Anderson v. Anderson

194 So. 2d 906, 1967 Fla. LEXIS 4133
Supreme Court of Florida·Decided February 8, 1967·No. No. 34957·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinions

PER CURIAM.

The Petition for Writ of Certiorari reflected probable jurisdiction in this Court. We issued the Writ and have heard argument of the parties. After argument and upon further consideration of the matter, we have determined that the Writ was improvidently issued. Therefore, the Writ is hereby discharged and the Petition for Writ of Certiorari dismissed.

It is so ordered.

THORNAL, C. J.,’ and THOMAS, DREW, O’CONNELL and CALDWELL, JJ., concur. ROBERTS, J., dissents with Opinion and agrees with ERVIN, J.

ERVIN, J., dissents with Opinion and agrees with ROBERTS, J.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Anderson v. Anderson, 194 So. 2d 906, 1967 Fla. LEXIS 4133 (Fla. 1967).

194 So. 2d 906 (Anderson v. Anderson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anderson v. Anderson
333 So. 2d 484 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1976)