Anderson v. Alpha Portland Industries, Inc.

647 F. Supp. 1109, 7 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 2534, 1986 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19661
CourtDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri
DecidedSeptember 30, 1986
Docket82-1413C(3)
StatusPublished
Cited by8 cases

This text of 647 F. Supp. 1109 (Anderson v. Alpha Portland Industries, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, E.D. Missouri primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Anderson v. Alpha Portland Industries, Inc., 647 F. Supp. 1109, 7 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 2534, 1986 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19661 (E.D. Mo. 1986).

Opinion

647 F.Supp. 1109 (1986)

Robert ANDERSON, Jr., et al., Plaintiffs,
v.
ALPHA PORTLAND INDUSTRIES, INC., et al., Defendants.

No. 82-1413C(3).

United States District Court, E.D. Missouri.

September 30, 1986.

Sheldon Weinhaus, Levin and Weinhaus, Joseph B. Moore, Asst. U.S. Atty., Gary R. Slemmens, Veteran Admin., St. Louis, Mo., for plaintiffs.

George S. Hecker, Michael G. Biggers, Stephen R. Snodgrass, Bryan, Cave, *1110 McPheeters & McRoberts, Edward K. Fehlig, Ziercher, Hocker, Human, Michenfelder, Nations & Jones, James I. Singer, Charles A. Werner, Schuchat, Cook & Werner, St. Louis, Mo., Robert L. Dameron, Albert F. Kuhl, Blake & Uhlig, Kansas City, Kan., for defendants.

MEMORANDUM

HUNGATE, District Judge.

This matter is before the Court after a four-day nonjury trial to determine defendants' liability with respect to the merits of class plaintiffs' claims.[1]

Pursuant to the Labor Management Relations Act (LMRA) and the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA), named plaintiffs, retired hourly employees of defendant Alpha Portland Industries, Inc. (Alpha), in general seek on behalf of themselves and a class relief for defendants' allegedly improper termination of life and health insurance benefits previously provided to Alpha retirees and their dependents pursuant to the defendant Insurance and Health Plan for Hourly Employees, Alpha Portland Cement Company (Plan). Defendant The Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United States (Equitable) provided and participated in the administration of the policies at issue here. Defendants deny liability.

Having carefully considered the record herein, including the pleadings, the parties' joint stipulation of uncontested facts, the relevant exhibits and testimony, and the parties' argument, the Court hereby makes and enters the following findings of fact and conclusions of law.

Findings of Fact

1. Prior to their retirement, named plaintiffs each worked as an hourly employee of the cement division of defendant Alpha Portland Industries, Inc. (Alpha).

2. Defendant Alpha was at all relevant times a corporation and an employer engaged in commerce and in activities affecting commerce. Until 1972, defendant Alpha was known as Alpha Portland Cement Company, and since 1985 it it known as Slattery Group, Inc.

3. In 1946, defendant Alpha unilaterally created the defendant Insurance and Health Plan for Hourly Employees, Alpha Portland Cement Company (Plan). The Plan covered only hourly workers and hourly retirees from Alpha's cement plants.

4. Defendant The Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United States (Equitable) participated in the administration of the Plan.

5. Named plaintiffs represent a certified class consisting of:

A. All persons defined as retirees under the terms of Alpha Portland Industries, Inc.'s Insurance and Health Plan for Hourly Employees (Plan), whose benefits were terminated under said Plan by defendants on or after May 1, 1982.
B. All beneficiaries under the terms of the Plan who would have been entitled to receive benefits under the Plan by reason of their relationship to retirees, whose entitlement to benefits from and after May 1, 1982, was terminated by defendants.
C. Kin of deceased retirees and of deceased beneficiaries entitled to benefits under the terms of said Plan by reason of familial relationship to retirees, where the death occurred on or after May 1, 1982. (This class includes the surviving spouse and if no surviving spouse, the children of the deceased retiree or deceased beneficiary.)

6. At the time of their respective retirements from Alpha, named plaintiffs and members of the first plaintiff subclass were eligible to receive health and life insurance provided to hourly retirees under the terms of the Plan then in effect. When this litigation began, there were approximately 453 retirees covered by the Plan. This total includes retirees from Alpha's cement plants in St. Louis, Missouri; Orange, *1111 Texas; Birmingham, Alabama; Lime Kiln, Maryland, Cementon, New York; Jamesville, New York; Martin's Creek, Pennsylvania; LaSalle, Illinois; and Ironton, Ohio.[2]

7. From 1946 until 1955, Alpha unilaterally continued and modified the Plan. During this period, there were no formal Plan documents but there were booklets describing the benefit programs.

8. The 1946 Plan booklet did not contain provisions directed explicitly to retired employees. No term of duration was set forth in this booklet.

9. As revised in 1948, the Plan booklet stated that after retirement, if the employee was qualified as specified, life insurance under the Plan could continue in one-half the amount provided to working hourly employees. Booklet for Plan Revised November 1, 1948, at pages 8 and 2. The booklet stated the Plan would become effective, if at all, on November 1, 1948. Alpha explicitly stated in the booklet that the company hoped

to continue the Plan indefinitely but reserves the right to change, modify, or discontinue it if future conditions make such action necessary or if reduction of Company earnings make it impossible to continue.

Id. at 7 (continuation statement).

10. As revised in 1950, the booklet stated that qualified retirees would "have the privilege of continuing one-half the amount of their Group Life Insurance for which they were insured immediately prior to retirement." Plan Booklet-Revised November 1, 1950, at 9. The booklet also provided that:

Employees who retire with the consent of the Alpha Company will have the privilege of continuing their Hospitalization and Surgical Insurance for themselves and dependents. However, the Hospital Benefits for each covered person will be limited to a total of 31 days in any calendar year and Surgical Expense Benefits not to exceed one maximum surgical claim in any calendar year.

Id. at 14. This booklet stated the Plan revisions "will become effective November 1, 1950," and had the same "continuation statement" as the 1948 booklet. Id. at 8.

11. As revised in 1952, the booklet stated the life insurance benefits provided to hourly employees could continue for hourly employees who retired if they had attained fifteen years of continuous service, rather than the twenty-five years of service required before the 1952 revision. November 1, 1952, Plan Booklet at 8-9. That booklet also contained a hospital and surgical expense benefit provision identical to the one in the 1950 booklet except that hospital benefits for each covered person were

limited to a total of 31 days and a maximum reimbursement for additional charges not to exceed $100 in any one calendar year and Surgical Expense Benefits may not exceed one maximum surgical claim in any calendar year.

Id. at 13-14. The 1952 booklet stated the revised Plan "will become effective on November 1, 1952;" and had the same continuation statement as the 1948 and 1950 booklets. Id. at 7; 3.

12. These booklets did not contain specific eligibility requirements for retired employees, although such requirements were set forth for other employees and their dependents. See 1946 Plan Booklet at 4; 1948 Plan Booklet at 6; 1950 Plan Booklet at 7; 1952 Plan Booklet at 6.

The 1946, 1948, 1950, and 1952 booklets stated Equitable underwrote the policies and provided that Equitable would determine the amounts paid for "cutting operations" not listed within the booklets.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
647 F. Supp. 1109, 7 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 2534, 1986 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19661, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/anderson-v-alpha-portland-industries-inc-moed-1986.