Anderson v. Adams

Court of Appeals of Texas

Anderson v. Adams

218 S.W. 552, 1920 Tex. App. LEXIS 73

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas

DecidedJanuary 29, 1920

DocketNo. 1049.

StatusPublished

This text of 218 S.W. 552 (Anderson v. Adams) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Anderson v. Adams, 218 S.W. 552, 1920 Tex. App. LEXIS 73 (Tex. Ct. App. 1920).

Pincite

Opinion

HARPER, C. J.

This suit was filed March 13, 1918, by W. T. Adams against Mark Anderson and Esther Anderson, in trespass to try title. Plaintiff took judgment by default March 6, 1919. On March 21, 1919, defendants filed motion for new trial. Upon hearing March 29, 1919, on evidence, the motion was overruled. Defendants have appealed, and assign this action of the court in overruling motion for new trial as reversible error. In this there was no error. Berhns v. Harris, 150 S. W. 495.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

HARPER, C. J.

This suit was filed March 13, 1918, by W. T. Adams against Mark Anderson and Esther Anderson, in trespass to try title. Plaintiff took judgment by default March 6, 1919. On March 21, 1919, defendants filed motion for new trial. Upon hearing March 29, 1919, on evidence, the motion was overruled. Defendants have appealed, and assign this action of the court in overruling motion for new trial as reversible error. In this there was no error. Berhns v. Harris, 150 S. W. 495.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

218 S.W. 552, 1920 Tex. App. LEXIS 73, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/anderson-v-adams-texapp-1920.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack