Anderson v. A. H. Sickinger, Inc.
This text of 235 A.D. 735 (Anderson v. A. H. Sickinger, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Judgment reversed on the law and the facts and a new trial granted, costs to abide the event. There is no proof in the record as to the value [736]*736of the mortgaged chattels at the time of their conversion by appellants; hence there is no basis for a deficiency judgment or for that part of the judgment which decrees that if possession of the chattels cannot be given to the plaintiff he is entitled to judgment for the full amount of the chattel mortgage plus interest and costs. Findings of fact and conclusions of law inconsistent herewith are reversed. Young, Seudder, Tompkins and Davis, JJ., concur; Lazansky, P. J., concurs in result. Settle order on notice.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
235 A.D. 735, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/anderson-v-a-h-sickinger-inc-nyappdiv-1932.