Anderson, Sean
This text of Anderson, Sean (Anderson, Sean) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS NO. WR-96,462-01
EX PARTE SEAN ANDERSON, Applicant
ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS CAUSE NO. D-1-DC-22-904055-A IN THE 390TH DISTRICT COURT TRAVIS COUNTY
Per curiam.
OPINION
Applicant was convicted of aggravated sexual assault of a child and sentenced to thirty-one
years’ imprisonment. The Third Court of Appeals affirmed his conviction. Anderson v. State, No.
03-23-00030-CR (Tex. App.—Austin Aug. 9, 2023) (not designated for publication). Applicant
filed this application for a writ of habeas corpus in the county of conviction, and the district clerk
forwarded it to this Court. See TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. art. 11.07.
Applicant contends, among other things, that appellate counsel failed to timely advise him
of his right to file a pro se petition for discretionary review. Based on the record, the trial court finds
that appellate counsel failed to comply with Tex. R. App. P. 48.4 and therefore Applicant was neither
timely informed of the direct appeal decision nor of his right to file a pro se petition for discretionary 2
review. The trial court recommends that Applicant be permitted to file an out-of-time petition for
discretionary review. We agree. The record shows that appellate counsel did not send Applicant the
required information and documentation within five days after the Court of Appeals’s opinion was
handed down on August 9, 2023, as required by Rule 48.4, and instead waited until after mandate
issued on November 8, 2023. Consequently, Applicant was not advised of his right to file a pro se
petition for discretionary review until after the period for filing such a petition had ended.
Relief is granted. Ex parte Wilson, 956 S.W.2d 25 (Tex. Crim. App. 1997); Ex parte Crow,
180 S.W.3d 135 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005). Applicant may file an out-of-time petition for
discretionary review of the judgment of the Third Court of Appeals in cause number 03-23-00030-
CR. Should Applicant decide to file a petition for discretionary review, he must file it with this
Court within thirty days from the date of this Court’s mandate. Applicant’s remaining claims are
dismissed. See Ex parte Torres, 943 S.W.2d 469 (Tex. Crim. App. 1997).
Copies of this opinion shall be sent to the Texas Department of Criminal Justice–Correctional
Institutions Division and the Board of Pardons and Paroles.
Delivered: MARCH 26, 2025 Do not publish
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Anderson, Sean, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/anderson-sean-texcrimapp-2025.