Anderson Petro-Equipment, Inc. and Curtis Ray Anderson v. State
This text of Anderson Petro-Equipment, Inc. and Curtis Ray Anderson v. State (Anderson Petro-Equipment, Inc. and Curtis Ray Anderson v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN
JUDGMENT RENDERED OCTOBER 22, 2013
NO. 03-13-00176-CV
Anderson Petro-Equipment, Inc. and Curtis Ray Anderson, Appellants
v.
The State of Texas, Appellee
APPEAL FROM THE 201ST DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE JONES, JUSTICES PEMBERTON AND FIELD AFFIRMED -- OPINION BY CHIEF JUSTICE JONES
THIS CAUSE came on to be heard on the record of the court below, and the same being
considered, it is the opinion of this Court that there was no error requiring reversal in the trial
court’s judgment: IT IS THEREFORE considered, adjudged and ordered that the trial court’s
judgment is in all things affirmed. It is FURTHER ordered that the appellants pay all costs
relating to this appeal, both in this Court and the court below; and that this decision be certified
below for observance.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Anderson Petro-Equipment, Inc. and Curtis Ray Anderson v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/anderson-petro-equipment-inc-and-curtis-ray-anders-texapp-2013.