Anderson Petro-Equipment, Inc. and Curtis Ray Anderson v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided October 22, 2013·No. 03-13-00176-CV·Published

Opinion

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED OCTOBER 22, 2013

NO. 03-13-00176-CV

Anderson Petro-Equipment, Inc. and Curtis Ray Anderson, Appellants

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

APPEAL FROM THE 201ST DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE JONES, JUSTICES PEMBERTON AND FIELD AFFIRMED -- OPINION BY CHIEF JUSTICE JONES

THIS CAUSE came on to be heard on the record of the court below, and the same being

considered, it is the opinion of this Court that there was no error requiring reversal in the trial

court’s judgment: IT IS THEREFORE considered, adjudged and ordered that the trial court’s

judgment is in all things affirmed. It is FURTHER ordered that the appellants pay all costs

relating to this appeal, both in this Court and the court below; and that this decision be certified

below for observance.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Anderson Petro-Equipment, Inc. and Curtis Ray Anderson v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2013).

Anderson Petro-Equipment, Inc. and Curtis Ray Anderson v. State (Anderson Petro-Equipment, Inc. and Curtis Ray Anderson v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.