Anderson (Montgomery) Vs. State
This text of 481 P.3d 1222 (Anderson (Montgomery) Vs. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nevada Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
MONTGOMERY ANDERSON, No. 82439 Appellant, vs. THE STATE OF NEVADA, Respondent. FILED FEB 2 6 2021 ELIZABETH A. BROWN CLERK OF SUPREME COURT BY Demme' mem( ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL
This is a pro se appeal from a district court order granting respondent's pretrial "motion in limine to admit evidence of other crimes, wrongs or acts." Eighth Judicial District Court, Clark County; Jacqueline M. Bluth, Judge. Because no statute or court rule permits an appeal from an order granting a pretrial "motion in limine to admit evidence of other crimes, wrongs or acts," this court lacks jurisdiction to consider this appeal. Castillo o. State, 106 Nev. 349, 352, 792 P.2d 1133, 1135 (1990). Accordingly, this court ORDERS this appeal DISMISSED.
earraguirre
./kkig4-.0 Stiglich Silver
SUPREME CouRT OF NEVADA
(0) 1947A anielir, 1-bSfoct3 cc: Hon. Jacqueline M. Bluth, District Judge Special Public Defender Attorney General/Carson City Clark County District Attorney Eighth District Court Clerk Montgomery Anderson
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
481 P.3d 1222, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/anderson-montgomery-vs-state-nev-2021.