Anderson (Montgomery) Vs. State
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
MONTGOMERY ANDERSON, No. 82439 Appellant,
vs.
THE STATE OF NEVADA,
Respondent.
FILED FEB 2 6 2021 ELIZABETH A. BROWN CLERK OF SUPREME COURT BY
Demme' mem(
ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL
This is a pro se appeal from a district court order granting respondent's pretrial "motion in limine to admit evidence of other crimes, wrongs or acts." Eighth Judicial District Court, Clark County; Jacqueline M. Bluth, Judge.
Because no statute or court rule permits an appeal from an order granting a pretrial "motion in limine to admit evidence of other crimes, wrongs or acts," this court lacks jurisdiction to consider this appeal. Castillo o. State, 106 Nev. 349, 352, 792 P.2d 1133, 1135 (1990). Accordingly, this court
ORDERS this appeal DISMISSED.
earraguirre
./kkig4-.0
Stiglich Silver
SUPREME CouRT OF NEVADA
(0) 1947A anielir, 1-bSfoct3
cc: Hon. Jacqueline M. Bluth, District Judge Special Public Defender Attorney General/Carson City Clark County District Attorney Eighth District Court Clerk Montgomery Anderson
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
481 P.3d 1222 (Anderson (Montgomery) Vs. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.