Anderson (Montgomery) Vs. State

481 P.3d 1222
Nevada Supreme Court·Decided February 26, 2021·No. 82439·Published

Opinion

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

MONTGOMERY ANDERSON, No. 82439 Appellant,

vs.

THE STATE OF NEVADA,

Respondent.

FILED FEB 2 6 2021 ELIZABETH A. BROWN CLERK OF SUPREME COURT BY

Demme' mem(

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL

This is a pro se appeal from a district court order granting respondent's pretrial "motion in limine to admit evidence of other crimes, wrongs or acts." Eighth Judicial District Court, Clark County; Jacqueline M. Bluth, Judge.

Because no statute or court rule permits an appeal from an order granting a pretrial "motion in limine to admit evidence of other crimes, wrongs or acts," this court lacks jurisdiction to consider this appeal. Castillo o. State, 106 Nev. 349, 352, 792 P.2d 1133, 1135 (1990). Accordingly, this court

ORDERS this appeal DISMISSED.

earraguirre

./kkig4-.0

Stiglich Silver

SUPREME CouRT OF NEVADA

(0) 1947A anielir, 1-bSfoct3

cc: Hon. Jacqueline M. Bluth, District Judge Special Public Defender Attorney General/Carson City Clark County District Attorney Eighth District Court Clerk Montgomery Anderson

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Anderson (Montgomery) Vs. State, 481 P.3d 1222 (Neb. 2021).

481 P.3d 1222 (Anderson (Montgomery) Vs. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Castillo v. State
792 P.2d 1133 (Nevada Supreme Court, 1990)