Anderson (Montgomery) Vs. State

Nevada Supreme Court·Decided February 21, 2020·No. 80506·Published

Opinion

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

MONTGOMERY ANDERSON, No. 80506 Appellant,

vs.

THE STATE OF NEVADA, FILED Respondent.

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL

This is a pro se appeal from an order of the district court granting the state's pretrial motion in limine to admit evidence of other crimes, wrongs, or acts. Eighth Judicial District Court, Clark County; Jacqueline M. Bluth, Judge.

Because no statute or court rule permits an appeal from the aforementioned order in a criminal matter, this court lacks jurisdiction to consider this appeal. Castillo v. State, 106 Nev. 349, 352, 792 P.2d 1133, 1135 (1990). Accordingly, this court ORDERS this appeal DISMISSED.

"I"C214)tarm.'"Ir Parraguirre

, J.

Hardesty Cadish

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA

(0) 1947A 447ba cc: Hon. Jacqueline M. Bluth, District Judge Special Public Defender Attorney General/Carson City Clark County District Attorney Eighth District Court Clerk

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA

(0) 1941A - .45. 2 1111111'

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Anderson (Montgomery) Vs. State, (Neb. 2020).

Anderson (Montgomery) Vs. State (Anderson (Montgomery) Vs. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Castillo v. State
792 P.2d 1133 (Nevada Supreme Court, 1990)