ANDERSON MARK PEROUSE v. STATE OF FLORIDA
This text of ANDERSON MARK PEROUSE v. STATE OF FLORIDA (ANDERSON MARK PEROUSE v. STATE OF FLORIDA) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT
ANDERSON MARK PEROUSE, Appellant,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee.
No. 4D21-1879
[November 18, 2021]
Appeal of order denying rule 3.850 motion from the Circuit Court for the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, St. Lucie County; Charles A. Schwab, Judge; L.T. Case No. 562016CF002102.
Anderson Mark Perouse, Graceville, pro se.
No appearance for appellee.
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed.
GERBER, FORST and KUNTZ, JJ., concur.
* * *
Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
ANDERSON MARK PEROUSE v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/anderson-mark-perouse-v-state-of-florida-fladistctapp-2021.