Anderson, M., Pet v. CCP Phila. Cty.
This text of Anderson, M., Pet v. CCP Phila. Cty. (Anderson, M., Pet v. CCP Phila. Cty.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA EASTERN DISTRICT
MALIK ANDERSON, : No. 23 EM 2022 : Petitioner : : : v. : : : HONORABLE TRACY BRANDEIS-ROMAN : JUDGE OF THE COMMON PLEAS OF : PHILADELPHIA COUNTY, : : Respondent :
ORDER
PER CURIAM
AND NOW, this 26th day of July, 2022, the Application for Leave to File Original
Process is GRANTED, and the “Petition for Review Consolidation of Mandamus and Writ
Pursuant to Pa.R.App.P. 1511(b) [sic] et seq.” is DENIED. The Prothonotary is
DIRECTED to strike the name of the jurist from the caption.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Anderson, M., Pet v. CCP Phila. Cty., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/anderson-m-pet-v-ccp-phila-cty-pa-2022.