Anderson, Johnny Lester

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas
DecidedJanuary 15, 2020
DocketWR-90,563-01
StatusPublished

This text of Anderson, Johnny Lester (Anderson, Johnny Lester) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Anderson, Johnny Lester, (Tex. 2020).

Opinion

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS NO. WR-90,563-01

EX PARTE JOHNNY LESTER ANDERSON, Applicant

ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS CAUSE NO. F14904-B IN THE 276TH DISTRICT COURT FROM MARION COUNTY

Per curiam.

ORDER

Applicant was convicted of indecency with a child and sentenced to twenty years’

imprisonment. The Sixth Court of Appeals affirmed his conviction. Anderson v. State, No. 06-18-

00106-CR (Tex. App.—Texarkana Oct. 4, 2018) (not designated for publication). Applicant filed

this application for a writ of habeas corpus in the county of conviction, and the district clerk

forwarded it to this Court. See TEX . CODE CRIM . PROC. art. 11.07.

Applicant contends, among other things, that trial counsel was ineffective. Applicant has

alleged facts that, if true, might entitle him to relief. Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668 (1984).

Accordingly, the record should be developed. The trial court is the appropriate forum for findings

of fact. TEX . CODE CRIM . PROC. art. 11.07, § 3(d). The trial court shall order trial counsel to 2

respond to Applicant’s fourth and sixth grounds. In developing the record, the trial court may use

any means set out in Article 11.07, § 3(d). If the trial court elects to hold a hearing, it shall determine

whether Applicant is indigent. If Applicant is indigent and wants to be represented by counsel, the

trial court shall appoint counsel to represent him at the hearing. See TEX . CODE CRIM . PROC. art.

26.04. If counsel is appointed or retained, the trial court shall immediately notify this Court of

counsel’s name.

The trial court shall make further findings of fact and conclusions of law as to whether trial

counsel’s performance was deficient and Applicant was prejudiced. The trial court may make any

other findings and conclusions that it deems appropriate in response to Applicant’s claims.

The trial court shall make findings of fact and conclusions of law within ninety days from

the date of this order. The district clerk shall then immediately forward to this Court the trial court’s

findings and conclusions and the record developed on remand, including, among other things,

affidavits, motions, objections, proposed findings and conclusions, orders, and transcripts from

hearings and depositions. See TEX . R. APP . P. 73.4(b)(4). Any extensions of time must be requested

by the trial court and obtained from this Court.

Filed: January 15, 2020 Do not publish

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Strickland v. Washington
466 U.S. 668 (Supreme Court, 1984)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Anderson, Johnny Lester, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/anderson-johnny-lester-texcrimapp-2020.