Anderson (Jayon) v. Dist. Ct. (State)

Nevada Supreme Court·Decided April 21, 2022·No. 84449·Published

Opinion

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

JAYON ANDERSON, No. 84449 Petitioner, vs. THE EIGHTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA, ELIE IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF CLARK, Respondent,

and THE STATE OF NEVADA, Real Party in Interest.

ORDER DENYING PETITION

This is a pro se original postconviction petition for a writ of habeas corpus. An original petition in this court for a writ of habeas corpus is an improper method to challenge the conviction, as such a petition should be made in the district court in the first instance. NRS 34.738; NRAP 22 ("An application for an original writ of habeas corpus should be made to the appropriate district court. If an application is made to the district court and denied, the proper remedy is by appeal from the district court's order denying the writ."). Accordingly, we ORDER the

, J. , J.

Hardesty Stiglich

cc: Jayon Anderson

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA

(0) 1947A 4,66r9r, _ 22-1z._ 611

Attorney General/Carson City Clark County District Attorney Eighth District Court Clerk

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA

2

(0) 1947A

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Anderson (Jayon) v. Dist. Ct. (State), (Neb. 2022).

Anderson (Jayon) v. Dist. Ct. (State) (Anderson (Jayon) v. Dist. Ct. (State)) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

§ 34.738
Nevada § 34.738