Anderson (Jayon) v. Dist. Ct. (State)
This text of Anderson (Jayon) v. Dist. Ct. (State) (Anderson (Jayon) v. Dist. Ct. (State)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nevada Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
JAYON ANDERSON, No. 84449 Petitioner, vs. THE EIGHTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA, ELIE IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF CLARK, Respondent, and THE STATE OF NEVADA, Real Party in Interest.
ORDER DENYING PETITION
This is a pro se original postconviction petition for a writ of habeas corpus. An original petition in this court for a writ of habeas corpus is an improper method to challenge the conviction, as such a petition should be made in the district court in the first instance. NRS 34.738; NRAP 22 ("An application for an original writ of habeas corpus should be made to the appropriate district court. If an application is made to the district court and denied, the proper remedy is by appeal from the district court's order denying the writ."). Accordingly, we ORDER the
, J. , J. Hardesty Stiglich
cc: Jayon Anderson
SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA
(0) 1947A 4,66r9r, _ 22-1z._ 611 Attorney General/Carson City Clark County District Attorney Eighth District Court Clerk
SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA 2 (0) 1947A
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Anderson (Jayon) v. Dist. Ct. (State), Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/anderson-jayon-v-dist-ct-state-nev-2022.