Anderson, James Matthew
This text of Anderson, James Matthew (Anderson, James Matthew) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of indecency with a child and sentenced to twelve years' imprisonment. He did not appeal his conviction.
Applicant contends that he is actually innocent and that trial counsel was ineffective. On November 10, 2010, we remanded this application for findings of fact and conclusions of law on Applicant's actual innocence claim. On remand, after holding a live evidentiary hearing, the trial court concluded that Applicant had not established that he is actually innocent. We agree. Relief is denied. Applicant's other claim is dismissed. Tex. Code Crim. Proc. art. 11.07, § 4. Accordingly, this application is denied in part and dismissed in part.
Filed: April 6, 2011
Do not publish
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Anderson, James Matthew, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/anderson-james-matthew-texcrimapp-2011.