Anderson (Anthony) v. State
This text of Anderson (Anthony) v. State (Anderson (Anthony) v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nevada Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
spent on house arrest is not actual confinement under NRS 176.055(1) for purposes of awarding presentence credits. See State v. Dist. Ct. (Jackson), 121 Nev. 413, 418-19, 116 P.3d 834, 837 (2005). Appellant failed to provide any other specific facts in support of his request for additional presentence credits. Accordingly, we ORDER the judgment of the district court AFFIRMED. 2
J. Hardesty
cc: Chief Judge, Eighth Judicial District Court Hon. J. Charles Thompson, Senior Judge Anthony K. Anderson Attorney General/Carson City Clark County District Attorney Eighth District Court Clerk
2We have reviewed all documents that appellant has submitted in proper person to the clerk of this court in this matter, and we conclude that no relief based upon those submissions is warranted. To the extent that appellant has attempted to present claims or facts in those submissions which were not previously presented in the proceedings below, we have declined to consider them in the first instance.
SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA 2 (0) 1947A
NT
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Anderson (Anthony) v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/anderson-anthony-v-state-nev-2013.