Andersen Corp. v. Commissioner

5 T.C.M. 392, 1946 Tax Ct. Memo LEXIS 186
CourtUnited States Tax Court
DecidedMay 23, 1946
DocketDocket No. 6893.
StatusUnpublished

This text of 5 T.C.M. 392 (Andersen Corp. v. Commissioner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Tax Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Andersen Corp. v. Commissioner, 5 T.C.M. 392, 1946 Tax Ct. Memo LEXIS 186 (tax 1946).

Opinion

Andersen Corporation, a Minnesota Corporation, v. Commissioner.
Andersen Corp. v. Commissioner
Docket No. 6893.
United States Tax Court
1946 Tax Ct. Memo LEXIS 186; 5 T.C.M. (CCH) 392; T.C.M. (RIA) 46116;
May 23, 1946

*186 In 1937, petitioner, a Minnesota corporation, in a reorganization exchanged its stock and debentures for the stock of the predecessor corporation. On the facts it is held, that the interest paid or properly accrued in the taxable years on such debentures was deductible from gross income under section 23 (b), I.R.C.

William H. Oppenheimer, Esq., W-1781 First Nat'l Bank Bldg., Saint Paul 1, Minn., for the petitioner. Edward C. Adams, Esq., for the respondent.

LEECH

Memorandum Findings of Fact and Opinion

LEECH, Judge: This proceeding involves deficiencies in income taxes, declared value excess-profits taxes and excess-profits taxes, as follows:

Declared
Incomevalue excess-Excess-
Yeartaxprofits taxprofits tax
1939$12,431.47$ 2,582.48
194019,694.852,696.41$ 5,523.49
194112,328.674,542.5839,454.09
194210,061.623,703.2446,916.45
19437,515.6410,310.6040,969.82

*187 The basic question is whether the amounts accrued by petitioner upon its so-called 7% debenture bonds are deductible as interest on indebtedness within the purview of section 23 (b) of the Internal Revenue Code.

The case was submitted upon a stipulation of facts, oral testimony and exhibits. The facts stipulated are so found. Others are found from the evidence.

Findings of Fact

Petitioner was incorporated on June 28, 1937, under the laws of the State of Minnesota, with an authorized capital stock of 10,000 shares of no par value. Its Federal tax returns for the periods involved were filed with the collector of internal revenue for the district of Minnesota at St. Paul. Petitioner kept its books of account on the accrual basis of accounting.

From 1930 to date the petitioner's predecessor company and petitioner have specialized in the manufacture of complete window frame units for installation in homes and buildings of all types. Petitioner's predecessor corporation, to wit: Anderson Frame Corporation (hereinafter sometimes called "Frame"), was incorporated (under the name "Andersen Lumber Company"; changed in 1929 to Andersen Frame Company) under the*188 laws of the State of Wisconsin on August 1, 1903, and its principal office and place of business was Hudson, Wisconsin, from 1903 to 1913 when it removed to Bayport, Minnesota, where the business, at all times here material, has been conducted. Frame has filed its corporation Federal tax returns here material, i.e., for the years 1937 to 1943, both inclusive, with the collector of internal revenue for the district of Minnesota, at St. Paul.

From date of incorporation through March 1, 1913, Frame had outstanding $100,000 par value common stock (1,000 shares at $100 each) which constituted its then entire stock issue. This issued and outstanding stock was thereafter increased as follows:

March 1, 1913Outstanding$ 100,000
1922Stock dividend - common500,000
1926Stock dividend - common500,000
1935Sold for cash at par18,800
Total issued and outstanding June
28, 1937$1,118,800

Prior to June 28, 1937, Frame owned all of the issued and outstanding capital stock of the following subsidiary corporations:

(a) Andersen Foundry Company (hereinafter sometimes called "Foundry");

(b) Home Builders Finance Company (hereinafter sometimes called*189 "Finance"); and

(c) Bayport Home Company (hereinafter sometimes called "Home").

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Gregory v. Helvering
293 U.S. 465 (Supreme Court, 1935)
Higgins v. Smith
308 U.S. 473 (Supreme Court, 1940)
Helvering v. Horst
311 U.S. 112 (Supreme Court, 1940)
John Kelley Co. v. Commissioner
326 U.S. 521 (Supreme Court, 1946)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
5 T.C.M. 392, 1946 Tax Ct. Memo LEXIS 186, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/andersen-corp-v-commissioner-tax-1946.