Home/Supreme Court/Anderegg v. United States

Anderegg v. United States

336 U.S. 967, 69 S. Ct. 937, 93 L. Ed. 1118, 1949 U.S. LEXIS 2467
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedMay 2, 1949
DocketNo. 605
StatusPublished
Cited by54 cases

This text of 336 U.S. 967 (Anderegg v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Anderegg v. United States, 336 U.S. 967, 69 S. Ct. 937, 93 L. Ed. 1118, 1949 U.S. LEXIS 2467 (1949).

Opinion

C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Okutsu v. State.
528 P.3d 956 (Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals, 2023)
Addamax Corp. v. Open Software Foundation, Inc.
964 F. Supp. 549 (D. Massachusetts, 1997)
Robert L. Mendenhall, and Cmi Corporation v. Cedarapids, Inc., Defendant/cross-Appellant
5 F.3d 1557 (Federal Circuit, 1993)
Bevelheimer v. United States
4 Cl. Ct. 558 (Court of Claims, 1984)
MCI Communications Corporation and MCI Telecommunications Corporation v. American Telephone and Telegraph Company
708 F.2d 1081 (Seventh Circuit, 1983)
Litton Sys., Inc. v. Southwestern Bell Telephone Co.
700 F.2d 785 (Second Circuit, 1983)
Litton Systems, Inc., Litton Business Telephone Systems, Inc., Litton Business Systems, Inc., and Litton Industries Credit Corporation, Plaintiffs-Appellees- Cross v. American Telephone and Telegraph Company, Western Electric Company, Inc., Bell Telephone Laboratories, Inc., New York Telephone Company, Inc., New Jersey Bell Telephone Company, Southern Bell Telephone and Telegraph Company, the Ohio Bell Telephone Company, Southwestern Bell Telephone Company, the Pacific Telephone and Telegraph Company, and Pacific Northwest Bell Telephone Company, Defendants-Appellants-Cross Litton Systems, Inc. v. Southwestern Bell Telephone Company
700 F.2d 785 (Second Circuit, 1983)
Southern Pacific Communications Co. v. American Telephone & Telegraph Co.
556 F. Supp. 825 (District of Columbia, 1983)
Morales v. Vega
461 F. Supp. 656 (D. Puerto Rico, 1978)
Francisco Hernandez Jimenez v. Astol Calero Toledo
576 F.2d 402 (First Circuit, 1978)
Kadar Corp. v. Mary H. Milbury
549 F.2d 230 (First Circuit, 1977)
Leroy J. Blackwelder v. Richard M. Millman
522 F.2d 766 (Fourth Circuit, 1975)
Vandervelde v. Put and Call Brokers and Dealers Ass'n
344 F. Supp. 118 (S.D. New York, 1972)
Roy Paul Pomrening v. United Air Lines, Inc.
448 F.2d 609 (Seventh Circuit, 1971)
Exhibitors Poster Exchange, Inc. v. National Screen Service Corporation
421 F.2d 1313 (Fifth Circuit, 1970)
Automatic Radio Mfg. Co., Inc. v. Ford Motor Company
390 F.2d 113 (First Circuit, 1968)
Masae Kondo v. Nicholas Deb. Katzenbach, Attorney General of the United States, Masaru Okamoto v. Nicholas Deb. Katzenbach, Attorney General of the United States, Ayako Honda v. Nicholas Deb. Katzenbach, Attorney General of the United States
356 F.2d 351 (D.C. Circuit, 1966)
Kondo v. Katzenbach
356 F.2d 351 (D.C. Circuit, 1966)
Riley v. United States
248 F. Supp. 95 (D. Maryland, 1965)
The Haverhill Gazette Company v. Union Leader Corporation, Union Leader Corporation v. The Haverhill Gazette Company
333 F.2d 798 (First Circuit, 1964)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
336 U.S. 967, 69 S. Ct. 937, 93 L. Ed. 1118, 1949 U.S. LEXIS 2467, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/anderegg-v-united-states-scotus-1949.