Ancrum v. Eisenberg

648 N.E.2d 787, 85 N.Y.2d 853, 624 N.Y.S.2d 367, 1995 N.Y. LEXIS 315
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedFebruary 23, 1995
StatusPublished

This text of 648 N.E.2d 787 (Ancrum v. Eisenberg) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ancrum v. Eisenberg, 648 N.E.2d 787, 85 N.Y.2d 853, 624 N.Y.S.2d 367, 1995 N.Y. LEXIS 315 (N.Y. 1995).

Opinion

Appeal dismissed, without costs, by the Court of Appeals, sua sponte, upon the ground that the State Constitution (art VI, § 3 [b] [3], [4]) and the CPLR (5601 [c]; 5602 Ob] [1]) do not authorize a grant of leave to defendant on a certified question in these circumstances (see, Maynard v Greenberg, 82 NY2d 913).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Maynard v. Greenberg
631 N.E.2d 117 (New York Court of Appeals, 1994)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
648 N.E.2d 787, 85 N.Y.2d 853, 624 N.Y.S.2d 367, 1995 N.Y. LEXIS 315, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ancrum-v-eisenberg-ny-1995.