Ancowitz v. Sweeney
Opinion
Tenants are not entitled to recover for the plumbing and exterminating expenses which they voluntarily [260]*260incurred (Perlmutter v. Timely Toys, 8 A D 2d 834; Davar Holdings v. Cohen, 255 App. Div. 445, affd. 280 N. Y. 828; Emigrant Ind. Sav. Bank v. 108 W. 49th St. Corp., 255 App. Div. 570).
The final order should be unanimously modified upon the law and facts by dismissing tenants’ counterclaim on the merits and increasing landlord’s recovery to $333.52, with appropriate costs in the court below, and as so modified affirmed, without costs on this appeal.
Concur — Pette, Di Giovanna and Brown, JJ.
Final order modified, etc.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
21 Misc. 2d 259 (Ancowitz v. Sweeney) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.