Ancowitz v. Sweeney

21 Misc. 2d 259, 199 N.Y.S.2d 736, 1959 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2630
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York·Decided November 16, 1959·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Tenants are not entitled to recover for the plumbing and exterminating expenses which they voluntarily [260]*260incurred (Perlmutter v. Timely Toys, 8 A D 2d 834; Davar Holdings v. Cohen, 255 App. Div. 445, affd. 280 N. Y. 828; Emigrant Ind. Sav. Bank v. 108 W. 49th St. Corp., 255 App. Div. 570).

The final order should be unanimously modified upon the law and facts by dismissing tenants’ counterclaim on the merits and increasing landlord’s recovery to $333.52, with appropriate costs in the court below, and as so modified affirmed, without costs on this appeal.

Concur — Pette, Di Giovanna and Brown, JJ.

Final order modified, etc.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ancowitz v. Sweeney, 21 Misc. 2d 259, 199 N.Y.S.2d 736, 1959 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2630 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1959).

21 Misc. 2d 259 (Ancowitz v. Sweeney) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Davar Holdings, Inc. v. Cohen
21 N.E.2d 882 (New York Court of Appeals, 1939)
Davar Holdings, Inc. v. Cohen
255 A.D. 445 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1938)
Emigrant Industrial Savings Bank v. One Hundred Eight West Forty Ninth Street Corp.
255 A.D. 570 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1938)